Jingsha X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Jingsha X79 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '20 at 01:15
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 178 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 634 59% 494 Pts	64-Core 889 55% 889 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0318A0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 728 428 580 383 274 556 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 1,178 Write 432 Mixed 756 SusWrite 491 158% 714 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 98.8 4K Mixed 19 131% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 396 DQ Mixed 261 212% 295 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 234%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 134GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 69 64 70 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 72 Write 75.1 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 69.5 52% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 59%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 71GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 100 100 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 78.7 Write 38.2 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 100 50% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 392GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 99 95 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 88.5 Write 91.3 Mixed 50 SusWrite 97.6 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.5 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	4.62% Terrible	Read 12.9 Write 6.5 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 8.4 10% 8.38 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.62% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 38.3 MC Mixed 34.4 107% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Jingsha X79

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2667 v2IntelBench 75%, 1,324 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	3x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	3x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdata $59Bench 213%, 34,063 samples	1x
SS200S330G 30GBKingstonBench 54%, 159 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 322 samples	3x
Skill F3-12800CL9-4 4x4GBGBench 81%, 29 samples	2x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $346

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16