Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31230 2,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 80 2-Core 182 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 445 50% 395 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 450 580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0619) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	0.6% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.64 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.87 1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.6% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GBSJ 128GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJPA0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 68 132 173 174 162 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 210 Write 158 Mixed 116 SusWrite 141 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 20.8 60% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 18.9 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 29 26% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4x4GB 607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E31230IntelBench 69%, 2,472 samples	17x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
SU635 240GBAdata $20Bench 68%, 12,702 samples	4x
530 Series 240GBIntel $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 12GBHynixBench 36%, 20 samples	7x
RMR1870EC58E9F1333 CT102464BD160B.M16 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 CT102464BD160B.M16 24GBUnknownBench 47%, 8 samples	3x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	1x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $139

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16