Gigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 01:10
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 479
63% 472 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 63.2
53% 66.3 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 55.7
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 111 58 16 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 412
Write 349
Mixed 210
SusWrite 78.5
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 32.6
132% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 244
185% 253 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 101%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
20GB free
Firmware: 1111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,630
Write 1,580
Mixed 942
308% 1,384 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 89.3
271% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 835
DQ Write 1,928
DQ Mixed 1,079
909% 1,281 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB
114GB free
Firmware: MPAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 62.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 69.9
39% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
366GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 85 84 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 55.5
Write 96.3
Mixed 56
SusWrite 85.8
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 90%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
42GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 32
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 35.2
86% 90 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 5.2
967% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 5.9
1,188% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 114%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB-$41
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $599
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback