Lenovo TP-GL___

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo TP-GL___  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 14:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 43
26% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 76.7
8-Core 149
13% 113 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 6.84
4% 6.09 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 8.52
5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 342 372 353 362 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 362
Write 355
Mixed 315
SusWrite 349
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 18.2
61% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 158
120% 160 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 14
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback