| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111012 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 11 '20 at 12:15 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
| CPU Throttled | 99% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
55.6%
Above average
|
55% 86.4 Pts
|
22% 160 Pts
|
10% 160 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520MX
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 1GB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.7654
|
2.26%
Terrible
|
2% 2.31 fps
|
2% 3.14 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 66 59 81 90 89 MB/s
|
47.7%
Average
|
56% 76.5 MB/s
|
141% 1 MB/s
| |
|
ASMT 2115 250GB
176GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 23 22 22 MB/s
|
22.5%
Poor
|
31% 22.8 MB/s
|
332% 4.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273CM0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
|
47.8%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 64x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 162x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 69x |
| GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples | 40x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $228 |