Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '20 at 01:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 672
72% 573 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 8.03
6% 24.9 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 16
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 260 259 202 250 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 627
Write 331
Mixed 244
SusWrite 255
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 24.7
103% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 137
109% 159 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 153%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
135GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 311 304 282 289 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 439
Write 358
Mixed 264
SusWrite 288
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 31.1
101% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 241
196% 280 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 134%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 32 34 35 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 12.8
Write 26.1
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 33.4
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback