Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200323
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$236 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 76.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 264 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 943 85% 716 Pts	64-Core 1,616 100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.8% Poor	Lighting 31.5 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 32.7 26% 32.5 fps	MRender 26.9 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 21.7 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1385 400 399 401 401 402 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	254% Outstanding	Read 2,401 Write 2,152 Mixed 1499 SusWrite 564 369% 1,654 MB/s	4K Read 56.2 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 77 256% 89.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,010 DQ Write 970 DQ Mixed 1072 782% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 254% Great: 302%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 255GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 52 51 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 61.7 Write 53.7 Mixed 43 SusWrite 50.9 39% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 49%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 115GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 106 121 135 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 102 Write 109 Mixed 75 SusWrite 122 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB 54,117 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 22.2 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	400x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	230x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	203x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	146x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	133x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	119x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,726

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16