Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 07:45
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 721
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 179
Parallax 194
147% 185 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 159
Splatting 112
126% 160 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 405 406 413 396 392 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 719
Write 582
Mixed 384
SusWrite 410
117% 524 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 29.5
88% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1015
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 938
674% 874 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 119%
Great: 355%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
156GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 98 100 100 97 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34% Below average
Read 149
Write 109
Mixed 113
SusWrite 100
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 11.4
42% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 202
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 34%
Great: 91%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
422GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 62 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 54.1
Write 57.2
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 60.7
37% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33%
Great: 68%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
136GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 50.8
Write 25.9
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 50.3
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
264GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 71 75 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40% Average
Read 66.4
Write 84.8
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 73.1
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 43.9
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 30.4
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,807
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback