| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Studio XPS 435MT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0R849J |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.2 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091221 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '20 at 02:28 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.1%
Good
|
63% 101 Pts
|
37% 297 Pts
|
22% 354 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
79.8%
Very good
|
66% 112 fps
|
107% 136 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 205 204 206 205 206 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
46% 203 MB/s
|
64% 19.6 MB/s
|
32% 44.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.3%
Below average
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
67% 59.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 268x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 18x |
| Xeon W3580IntelBench 72%, 653 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 17x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
| Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $199 |