Asus X202EP

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus X202EP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X202EP
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120910
Uptime	22 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 987 1,524 User benchmarks, average bench 40% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 38.5 2-Core 57.8 42% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 56.5 8-Core 58.6 8% 57.5 Pts	64-Core 58.2 4% 58.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 108D) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.53 0% 0.41 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 360 401 417 416 425 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 420 Write 389 Mixed 332 SusWrite 392 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 26.5 88% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 146 115% 159 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G4E1 1x4GB 1,492 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 7.4 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X202EP Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X202EP

CPU
Pentium 987IntelBench 40%, 1,524 samples	26x
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	17x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G4E1 1x4GBMicronBench 23%, 1,492 samples	26x
4KTF25664HZ-1G4E1 1x2GBMicronBench 20%, 230 samples	9x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16