HP ProBook 4530s (LJ518UT#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 4530s (LJ518UT#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 167C
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 15:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 57
2-Core 104
52% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 137
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 167C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.38
0% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF3OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 62 56 57 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 70
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 58.4
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback