Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '20 at 08:20
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 239 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 783 72% 601 Pts	64-Core 1,251 77% 1,251 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB 10,211 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0518BS SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 412 465 466 466 442 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 462 Mixed 419 SusWrite 446 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 39.7 139% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 247 201% 281 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 695GB free Firmware: GKAOA9DA SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 82 76 57 62 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 66.3 Write 76.2 Mixed 41 SusWrite 70.3 46% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 46%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 113 92 119 121 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 108 Write 111 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 114 71% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 926GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 112 91 115 110 107 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 196 Write 146 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 110 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 877GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 156 177 174 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 171 Mixed 37.9 SusWrite 171 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 500GB free Firmware: 2BA30004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 0 0 9.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 102 Write 48.7 Mixed 57 SusWrite 17.1 42% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB 10,297 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 34.9 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 30.5 88% 30.9 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)