Foxconn BANFF13

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFoxconn BANFF13  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN Pangu-G
Memory123.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 05:25
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 46.7
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 145
48% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 562
50% 425 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9271-4i 478GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 132 124 124 125 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 19.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 17
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.1
229% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 41.4
132% 46 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 108%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback