Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 173 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 670 59% 502 Pts	64-Core 1,001 62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 37.9 33% 36.8 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 36.9 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 462GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 231 227 228 228 229 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.2% Good	Read 231 Write 208 Mixed 204 SusWrite 230 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 28.3 89% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 593GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 211 210 204 206 205 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 312 Write 254 Mixed 260 SusWrite 209 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 22.8 74% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 106 85% 120 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 121%
Seagate BUP BL 4TB 4,922 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 347GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 70 66 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 52.1 Write 77.5 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 68.3 50% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.3 200% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 82GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 19.5 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	297x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	272x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	252x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16