Asus H81M-P

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H81M-P (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '20 at 12:54
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 178 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 340 45% 339 Pts	64-Core 336 21% 336 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 04A1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.3% Poor	Lighting 34.4 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 41.3 28% 35.5 fps	MRender 27.6 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 35.4 26% 31.2 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 83 78 80 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 129 Write 98.8 Mixed 121 SusWrite 79.8 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 24.3 100% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 97 78% 110 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 816GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 170 182 182 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 186 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 179 108% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 12GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.7% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-P Builds (Compare 346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-P

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	92x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	41x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 49%, 1,126 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16