Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 249
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 830
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,816
112% 1,816 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 31
Parallax 38.5
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 34.6
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 447 461 500 530 465 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 816
Mixed 258
SusWrite 478
139% 626 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 20.2
73% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 386
297% 424 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 109%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 500GB
26GB free
Firmware: EXT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 264 246 281 303 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 316
Write 264
Mixed 186
SusWrite 258
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 20.8
80% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 160
132% 190 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 119%
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 500GB
263GB free
Firmware: EXT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 254 206 200 257 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 339
Write 278
Mixed 158
SusWrite 222
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 15.3
48% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 136
115% 169 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 119%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
152GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,936
Write 2,682
Mixed 3,431
813% 3,683 MB/s
4K Read 292
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 133
704% 199 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 323
329% 570 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
860GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 88 90 102 105 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 80
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 92.3
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3000C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 34.3
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 20.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,486
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback