Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 10:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 246
89% 155 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 539
61% 467 Pts
64-Core 546
37% 546 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5177
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 92.2
22% 80.4 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 83.3
Splatting 51.4
24% 69.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$166
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 856 938 997 1083 1081 1089 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,302
Write 1,088
Mixed 965
SusWrite 1,007
245% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 67.9
216% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 751
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 773
585% 781 MB/s
Poor: 241%
This bench: 216%
Great: 353%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 86 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 50
Write 66.5
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 85
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 24.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback