Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 08:55
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 262
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 824
81% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.3% Average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 46.4
42% 51.5 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 57.1
44% 52.8 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7210
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 9.16
6% 9.45 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 17.1
11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 613 277 282 278 274 273 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,368
Write 1,404
Mixed 1,264
SusWrite 333
297% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 73.5
256% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 993
DQ Mixed 1004
749% 991 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 238%
Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
437GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 462 469 471 472 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 464
Mixed 444
SusWrite 466
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 51.6
172% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 293
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
905GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 160 161 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 109
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 159
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
32GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 87.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 29.4
59% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.5
190% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 23
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback