Mousecomputer/o7hpr64 B85H3-M4

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Mousecomputer/o7hpr64 B85H3-M4 (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer B85H3-M4
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140102
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '20 at 15:41
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 152 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 283 33% 256 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1454) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37 Reflection 28 Parallax 40.2 30% 35.1 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 34.5 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 522GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 441 434 445 470 474 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 448 Mixed 391 SusWrite 449 99% 437 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 44.1 158% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 238 188% 257 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 121%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 718GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 130 125 131 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50% Average	Read 138 Write 135 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 128 138% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 15.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 17.3 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85H3-M4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

System: Mousecomputer/o7hpr64 B85H3-M4

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	2x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	2x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	1x

RAM
RB16D3LU1KFG/8G 0711 PUD31600C118GVS 16GBKingstonBench 57%, 2 samples	2x
F641GU67F1600G 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 228 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $597

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16