Acer Extensa 215-51K

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Acer Extensa 215-51K (all builds)
Motherboard	SKL Taurus_KL
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191025
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '20 at 12:02
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	96%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6300U 59,619 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 237 33% 245 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 1355) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.87 Reflection 8.58 Parallax 5.97 5% 6.8 fps	MRender 9.14 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 11.7 8% 8.76 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB 5,630 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 694 498 475 593 541 507 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 819 Write 812 Mixed 749 SusWrite 552 165% 733 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 33.2 113% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 841 DQ Write 73.2 DQ Mixed 139 182% 351 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 157%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.1 6 6 6 6.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 4 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6 9% 8.35 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB 15,613 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.9% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 21.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Extensa 215-51K Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-51K

CPU
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	12x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	9x
Core i5-6300UIntelBench 40%, 59,619 samples	6x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	9x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	6x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	6x

SSD
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	5x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 512GBNvmeBench 125%, 1,404 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 017A 78.B2GG5.AU20B 8GBMicronBench 62%, 18 samples	5x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	4x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GBHynixBench 61%, 15,613 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16