Intel D845GEBV2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	INTEL_ D845GBV2
Motherboard	Intel D845GEBV2 (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20030714
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '20 at 06:02
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz 212 User benchmarks, average bench 23% J2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 11.3 2-Core 21 28% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 17.4 8-Core 26.1 3% 21.8 Pts	64-Core 24.3 2% 24.3 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6200 1,060 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(270F 1974) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 254GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00.02C01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6.5 8.3 8.6 8.8 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 46.5 Write 35.3 Mixed 29.4 SusWrite 8 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 46%
WD WD800JB-00JJC0 80GB 1,066 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 29GB free Firmware: 17.07W17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 6.7 8.9 9.1 8.9 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.87% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 30.3 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 8.4 14% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.87% Great: 31%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 28GB free Firmware: 17.07W17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.8 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.67% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 23.3 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 11.9 13% 17.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.67% Great: 31%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 53GB free, PID null, ScanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 7 9.9 11 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.55% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 10.8 Mixed 4.6 SusWrite 9.6 14% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.3 95% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.55% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.78% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.8 6% 1.97 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.83 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Intel D845GEBV2

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)