| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| System | Supermicro X9DRG-QF (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRG-QF |
| Memory | 58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150325 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 18 '17 at 13:33 |
| Run Duration | 96 Seconds |
| Run User | SGP-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
62.7%
Good
|
60% 106 Pts
|
58% 493 Pts
|
78% 1260 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 331.82
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
13% 15.7 fps
|
14% 17.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
54% 74.5 MB/s
|
75% 0.81 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M392B1K70CM0-CH9 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
86.4%
Excellent
|
101% 35.4 GB/s
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9DRG-QF Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DRG-QF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v21stBench 63%, 551 samples | 3x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 2x |
| GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 34% - Below average | Total price: $130 |