| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte G31M-ES2C |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090205 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 18 '17 at 13:32 |
| Run Duration | 440 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
32.3%
Below average
|
32% 45 Pts
|
6% 51.4 Pts
|
4% 68.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
|
3.03%
Terrible
|
3% 3.83 fps
|
3% 3.99 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
87%
Excellent
|
80% 110 MB/s
|
56% 0.59 MB/s
| |
|
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
6GB free, PID 0245
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
8.93%
Terrible
|
8% 8.35 MB/s
|
69% 1.29 MB/s
| |
|
Kingston DataTraveler 102 8GB
4GB free, PID 162d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
6.63%
Terrible
|
13% 12.6 MB/s
|
26% 1.99 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
11% 3.93 GB/s
|
5% 1.7 GB/s
|
30% 134 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-G31M-S2C Builds (Compare 133 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 15x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 10x |
| GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $121 |