Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRG-Q
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 11:10
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel 0000
CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 83
2-Core 167
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 606
52% 445 Pts
64-Core 2,742
170% 2,742 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1650 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.1% Very good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 90.4
Parallax 162
71% 113 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 112
Splatting 132
94% 112 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 434 433 445 409 346 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 436
Mixed 297
SusWrite 418
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 36.9
132% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 132
156% 270 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 116%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
430GB free
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1795 1782 1790 1793 1793 1746 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1,901
Write 1,595
Mixed 918
SusWrite 1,783
348% 1,550 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 68.2
246% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 644
509% 709 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 294%
Great: 306%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
1TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 109 111 110 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 111
Write 107
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 109
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 99%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$64
564GB free
Firmware: 1K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 164 164 164 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 103
SusWrite 163
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 96%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 179 183 182 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 161
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 180
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
312% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 104%
Linux File-CD Gadget 16GB
15GB free, PID f000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 2.8 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 14.5
Write 19.4
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 14.5
23% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 4.2
429% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2K40BB1-CRC M393A2G40DB1-CRC 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $627
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback