Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55 315 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Memory 33.1 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 51.6 23% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 51.1 8-Core 51 7% 51 Pts	64-Core 52.9 3% 52.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 634 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 3FB9) 128MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 151 150 162 154 156 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 157 Write 152 Mixed 151 SusWrite 152 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 15.7 53% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 54.1 DQ Mixed 29.4 25% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 5 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55AMDBench 28%, 315 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2400ATIBench 1%, 634 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16