| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VG3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130711 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 06 '20 at 02:30 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | BOL-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.1%
Above average
|
64% 108 Pts
|
21% 160 Pts
|
10% 158 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
|
5.38%
Terrible
|
0% 11.6 fps
|
16% 18.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 67 33 23 39 18 MB/s
|
27.9%
Poor
|
38% 52.7 MB/s
|
68% 0.47 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 8.5 13 12 14 13 MB/s
|
9.79%
Terrible
|
21% 17.2 MB/s
|
41% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.2 GB/s
|
20% 7.07 GB/s
|
53% 74.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,068 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 107x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 93x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 90x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 209x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 63x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 49x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $83 |