Asus H81M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	6.25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-A (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '20 at 23:18
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 141 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 178 25% 184 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.8% Below average	Lighting 27 Reflection 66 Parallax 64.3 22% 52.4 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 55.2 51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshib DT01ACA100 1TB 1,368 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 541GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 77 57 86 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 70.5 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 82.2 11% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.2 2% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 200GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	20% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 41.8 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 41.8 50% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 0GB free, PID a009 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 80.3 Write 82.3 Mixed 32.8 79% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 16.8 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 15.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	236x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	123x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	109x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	175x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	116x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	107x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	91x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	36x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16