ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G751JY

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus G751JY (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G751JY
Memory	22.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '17 at 07:40
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4870HQ 3,774 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 105 2-Core 202 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 547 60% 474 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 22DA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 1402 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 63 Parallax 57.6 55% 62.8 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 60.3 Splatting 58.3 50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1793 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1197 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 513 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3211331 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 365 (C2) HDA temperature 73 57 184683986971 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 12808 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12120 (F2) Unknown 100 100 10659 (F4) Unknown 100 100 49 (F5) Unknown 100 100 67 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3398912	77.9% Very good	Read 499 Write 372 Mixed 507 102% 459 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 13.1 69% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 13.8 100% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 111%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1717 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 2621 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1015 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 55 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 45437 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 210453921815 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	72.4% Very good	Read 131 Write 121 Mixed 119 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.21 77% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C11S3L/8G Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 KHX1866C11S3L/8G 24GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.4% Very good	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 20.2 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G751JY Builds (Compare 575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Asus G751JY

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	238x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	202x
Core i7-4860HQIntelBench 69%, 1,015 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	346x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	228x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	1x

SSD
XP941 PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 133%, 1,434 samples	125x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	38x
X300s Non-Secure 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 1,499 samples	36x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	91x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	68x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback