MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory32.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 12:56
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 167
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 877
74% 636 Pts
64-Core 2,308
143% 2,308 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.77
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 174
Parallax 196
99% 164 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 201
Splatting 127
147% 188 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 112%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1546 1562 1561 1600 1606 1566 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,214
Write 1,539
Mixed 866
SusWrite 1,574
345% 1,548 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 53.1
177% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 609
448% 593 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 266%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
31GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1848
Write 1,725
Mixed 726
317% 1,433 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 52.1
170% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 538
DQ Mixed 636
469% 618 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
16GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,835
Write 1,607
Mixed 896
320% 1,446 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.4
176% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 663
489% 648 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 137 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 44
Mixed 62
SusWrite 137
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 72%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
3TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 169 176 174 173 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 170
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 174
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
374% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
150% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 72
MC Mixed 62.9
172% 60.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 26.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 150%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $753
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback