PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P (all builds) |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110719 |
Uptime | 46.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 05 '20 at 03:15 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
68.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
|
35%
Below average
|
|||
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 3FC0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 149 183 96 128 98 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
100GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 301 326 238 281 338 MB/s
|
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 82x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 66x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 23x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 19x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $552 |