Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 266
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 819
74% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,432
89% 1,432 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3935 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 2.62
0% 1.49 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 144
Splatting 119
80% 92.4 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
220GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 444 447 446 447 446 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 436
Mixed 434
SusWrite 446
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 52.6
171% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
SABRENT 1TB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,387
Write 2,313
Mixed 1,537
1,308% 1,746 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 74.4
13,142% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 1,201
11,214% 1,246 MB/s
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 120 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 171
Write 142
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 119
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
510GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 111 112 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 157
Write 133
Mixed 78
SusWrite 110
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 40.5
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 38.1
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback