Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	77.3 GB free of 80 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 18 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 22 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 815 73% 614 Pts	64-Core 2,289 142% 2,289 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 161GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1043 613 52 101 70 99 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 158GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1049 659 63 135 180 144 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 81%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 166GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 720 502 561 514 510 520 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 97GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 525 563 518 519 522 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 5x16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 5 of 5 slots used 80GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 56.7 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 41.5 128% 44.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 310%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16