Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 167 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 314 41% 307 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 120 856 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 9630) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.25% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 0.84 2% 2.69 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 3.26 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.25% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB 4,046 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 76 72 79 77 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 140 Write 117 Mixed 136 SusWrite 77.4 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 21.2 71% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 106 82% 113 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 465GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 138 140 139 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 134 Write 130 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 138 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron V01D3L84GB52852813 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 66.1 61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16