PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190605 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 04 '20 at 05:25 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
75%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 431 436 449 449 454 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
278GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 87 87 87 87 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
128GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 103 109 106 98 108 MB/s
|
54%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
87.4%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,233x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 948x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 401x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 411x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 381x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 284x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |