Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B450M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '20 at 21:25
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 182 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 271 35% 265 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1229 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 29.1 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 28.9 24% 27.9 fps	MRender 41.2 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 33.2 30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59 8,648 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,679 Write 1,518 Mixed 1,345 337% 1,514 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 59.5 203% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 816 DQ Write 540 DQ Mixed 714 523% 690 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 29GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 39 51 88 34 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 505 Write 452 Mixed 350 SusWrite 75.3 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 34.6 122% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 174 180% 293 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 176GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 98 99 97 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 114 Write 98.3 Mixed 58.8 SusWrite 97.1 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FD2 BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FB BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FD2 BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FB 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 33.7 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 38.1 SC Mixed 25.4 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,917x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,683x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	605x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	720x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	499x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	473x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	230x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	213x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	592x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	491x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	356x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $437

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16