Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 160 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 407 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55.1% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 95.9 56% 78.4 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 58.1 54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 438GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 103 Write 115 Mixed 59 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 151GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 96.4 Write 95.1 Mixed 59.5 62% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 17.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 7 10% 9.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.7 102% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 13.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16