Huawei KPL-W0X

Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHuawei KPL-W0X  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 20:23
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 29.1
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 101
36% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 401
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 484
32% 484 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Device(19E5 3E06) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: Q3 2018
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 15
Parallax 22.5
4% 17.8 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 15.8
4% 13.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 11%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TNF-N3A0A 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 220 220 226 240 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 341
Write 300
Mixed 324
SusWrite 228
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 18.4
62% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 146
110% 148 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical KPL-W0X Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 54%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei KPL-W0X

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback