Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '20 at 17:46
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 114 2-Core 208 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 607 63% 506 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2084 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	47% Average	Lighting 60.4 Reflection 59.3 Parallax 56.1 49% 58.6 fps	MRender 47 Gravity 54 Splatting 53.8 43% 51.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100-256GB 256GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 141 144 145 145 146 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 489 Write 302 Mixed 362 SusWrite 152 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 25.8 125% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 34.1 74% 150 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 550GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 167 160 156 144 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 135 Write 150 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 159 83% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL19-19-19 D4-2666 2x4GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 38.1 MC Mixed 30.8 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 41.4 SC Mixed 28.5 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,463x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	735x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	653x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $327

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16