HP ElitePad 1000 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ElitePad 1000 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2157
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190821
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 17:34
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3795
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 36.3
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 43.8
22% 34.2 Pts
4-Core 83.6
8-Core 83.3
11% 83.4 Pts
64-Core 86
5% 86 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
HP(103C 2157) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.82 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
18GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 25 28 27 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 28.5
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 24.6
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
72% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.9
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback