Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR) 14,746 User benchmarks, average bench 28% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 47.8 1-Core 54.7 2-Core 98.7 40% 67.1 Pts	4-Core 91 8-Core 93.2 12% 92.1 Pts	64-Core 86.9 5% 86.9 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1B70) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 7.38 Parallax 5.38 3% 5.53 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 4.43 3% 3.96 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 1x4GB 690 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.3 2% 0.87 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	50x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	1x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	1x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	3x
THNSNK128GVN8 128GBToshibaBench 56%, 2,065 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GBHynixBench 36%, 9,725 samples	19x
M471A5143EB1-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 1,996 samples	11x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 4,400 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16