Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 07:23
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 688
68% 543 Pts
64-Core 933
63% 933 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$230
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 232
Reflection 188
Parallax 216
61% 212 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 207
Splatting 154
62% 192 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$43
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 212 208 196 182 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 482
Write 231
Mixed 248
SusWrite 193
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 34.8
134% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 39.9
40% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
504GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 107 109 109 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 170
Write 171
Mixed 104
SusWrite 108
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 22 25 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 146
Write 36.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 21.1
63% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 8,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $962
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback