| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Asus X202E (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK X202E |
| Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120914 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 02 '20 at 22:13 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
| CPU Throttled | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-2365M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
|
33.8%
Below average
|
26% 34.2 Pts
|
7% 52.2 Pts
|
3% 50.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 108D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.6%
Terrible
|
0% 0.74 fps
|
1% 0.83 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 64 84 76 85 MB/s
|
46.5%
Average
|
53% 72.1 MB/s
|
111% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
21.3%
Poor
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
11% 3.93 GB/s
|
31% 130 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X202E Builds (Compare 157 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus X202E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples | 125x |
| Core i3-2365MIntelBench 41%, 2,016 samples | 30x |
| Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 127x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |