Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer CH20
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190516
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '20 at 20:50
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 224 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 347 45% 339 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.9% Very good	Lighting 82 Reflection 92.1 Parallax 75.1 67% 83.1 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 95.9 Splatting 91.9 88% 110 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 94%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.07% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 7.81 6% 8.43 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 6.63 Splatting 14.7 9% 11 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.07% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 597GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 980 1133 1180 1183 1117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 1,706 Write 1,869 Mixed 1,038 SusWrite 1,070 319% 1,421 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 56.3 171% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 913 DQ Write 97.7 DQ Mixed 187 218% 399 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB 2,188 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 28.1 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 26.2 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,059x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,444x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,752x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16