MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191107
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	53%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 63.1 1-Core 133 2-Core 252 80% 149 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 830 79% 652 Pts	64-Core 1,312 81% 1,312 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% PNY(196E 133C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.1% Poor	Lighting 24.2 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 6.94 20% 29.8 fps	MRender 59.2 Gravity 35.2 Splatting 29.9 32% 41.4 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 379 413 390 391 415 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 392 Write 363 Mixed 373 SusWrite 383 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 38.9 128% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 298 242% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 129GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 88 92 96 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 144 Write 125 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 92.5 71% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x16GB 2,627 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 29.7 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 22.2 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	436x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	300x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	220x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16