| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK FX505GT |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 02 '20 at 15:42 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 46% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
|
44.8%
Average
|
41% 66.6 Pts
|
26% 204 Pts
|
14% 235 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
8.85%
Terrible
|
8% 10.3 fps
|
10% 12.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.1%
Below average
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
27% 9.33 GB/s
|
30% 132 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,142 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples | 991x |
| Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples | 798x |
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 353x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 1,088x |
| GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples | 1,054x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |