Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 days ago, 4 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Gaming K6  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 13:15
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 229
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 530
59% 454 Pts
64-Core 628
42% 628 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 346
Reflection 319
Parallax 370
91% 345 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 332
Splatting 216
88% 244 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 105%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000L2 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0QBXV7
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,062
Write 304
Mixed 315
121% 560 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 34.6
153% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 415
365% 565 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 152%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
340GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 470
Write 427
Mixed 411
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 52.1
177% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 131%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$70
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 467
Write 448
Mixed 421
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 49.3
164% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 131%
Samsung 840 250GB-$199
230GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 442
Write 249
Mixed 176
63% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 22.5
106% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 58.1
106% 215 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 85%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$110
841GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 469
Write 403
Mixed 393
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 41.8
147% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 123%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z270 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback