Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 12:39
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 215
67% 126 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 420
49% 383 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 51.1
44% 56 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 71
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 600
Write 513
Mixed 250
100% 455 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 25.1
80% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 504
369% 484 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 480GB-$300
94GB free
Firmware: 0C4005T4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 613 718 713 552 536 518 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 538
Write 512
Mixed 319
SusWrite 608
111% 494 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 13.2
52% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 110
146% 267 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 181%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
332GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 147 140 144 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 144
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2A2666C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,155
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback