Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.8 GHz
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '20 at 12:38
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 187 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 503 51% 412 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 17.1 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 20.3 14% 18 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 22 Splatting 18 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 250GB-$299 1,431 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT43B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,699 Write 4,959 Mixed 5,144 1,175% 5,267 MB/s	4K Read 692 4K Write 260 4K Mixed 357 1,644% 436 MB/s	DQ Read 1,222 DQ Write 729 DQ Mixed 779 633% 910 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 110%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 845GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 91 94 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 84.5 Write 71.7 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 92.2 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050D 500GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 466GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 106 102 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 107 60% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1866 4x8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1777 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.6% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 20.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 21.6 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 59.6 67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QOSMIO X70-A Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	197x
Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples	4x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	138x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	61x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	3x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	6x

RAM
M471B1G73CB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 128 samples	21x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,157 samples	17x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16