Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 09:22
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 202
81% 137 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 522
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1644 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 212 211 198 190 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 452
Write 207
Mixed 253
SusWrite 203
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 22
85% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 126
109% 166 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 76%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
756GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 416 393 426 423 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 430
Mixed 286
SusWrite 410
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 33.9
130% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 269
226% 329 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
286GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 89.3
Write 90.2
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 74.4
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
241GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 102
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback