Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 days ago, 9 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 09:14
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 819
86% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,065
72% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$350
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.2% Very good
Lighting 295
Reflection 285
Parallax 331
78% 304 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 283
Splatting 227
78% 237 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$184
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1474 1471 1462 1417 1402 1391 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,495
Write 1,625
Mixed 1,603
SusWrite 1,436
400% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 63.7
212% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,179
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 206
260% 496 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 282%
Great: 374%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$220
167GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 168 163 161 162 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 445
Write 278
Mixed 268
SusWrite 168
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 26.5
90% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 173
126% 169 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
143GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 300 202 199 192 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 492
Write 362
Mixed 380
SusWrite 249
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 44.8
148% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 153
112% 150 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 134%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 126GB
28GB free, PID 7722
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 29 12 9.3 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 162
Write 22.5
Mixed 117
SusWrite 13.1
88% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.9
202% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Patriot 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.4% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 25.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 20,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,139
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $315Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback